「我認為能參與如此了不起的事情是一種榮幸和特權，並有機會和一位我認為非常不凡的人相處。請注意，我沒有任何其他意思，只是把他視為一位非常卓越的前總統。」
When Linus reimplemented UNIX, writing the Linux kernel, the situation was somewhat more complicated, with an additional layer of indirection. He was exposed to UNIX just as a user, but, apparently, had no access to the source code of UNIX. On the other hand, he was massively exposed to the Minix source code (an implementation of UNIX, but using a microkernel), and to the book describing such implementation as well. But, in turn, when Tanenbaum wrote Minix, he did so after being massively exposed to the UNIX source code. So, SCO (during the IBM litigation) had a hard time trying to claim that Linux contained any protected expressions. Yet, when Linus used Minix as an inspiration, not only was he very familiar with something (Minix) implemented with knowledge of the UNIX code, but (more interestingly) the license of Minix was restrictive, it became open source only in 2000. Still, even in such a setup, Tanenbaum protested about the architecture (in the famous exchange), not about copyright infringement. So, we could reasonably assume Tanenbaum considered rewrites fair, even if Linus was exposed to Minix (and having himself followed a similar process when writing Minix).，更多细节参见新收录的资料
Раскрыта причина переноса неонацистского «Кракена»14:27。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Иран выпустил ракеты и беспилотники по соседям после обещания не атаковать их19:36，推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息
«Всякий раз, когда такой крупный противник, как Россия, приходит на помощь иранцам, это вызывает опасения», — сказал он.